LMLSX
Price
$43.51
Change
-$0.04 (-0.09%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Net Assets
2.41B
RMFCX
Price
$63.84
Change
-$0.19 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Net Assets
118.05B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LMLSX vs RMFCX

LMLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LMLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LMLSX (2.41B). RMFCX (1.16) and LMLSX (1.12) have matching dividends . LMLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LMLSX (13 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LMLSX (0.44). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LMLSX (18.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMLSX: RMFCX (250) vs LMLSX (1000000). LMLSX (9.28) and RMFCX (8.88) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. LMLSX (20.03).
LMLSXRMFCXLMLSX / RMFCX
Total Expense Ratio0.440.9148%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio0.440.9148%
Fund Existence13 years24 years-
Gain YTD12.7139.137139%
Front LoadN/AN/A-
Min. Initial Investment1000000250400,000%
Min. Initial Investment IRAN/AN/A-
Net Assets2.41B118B2%
Annual Yield % from dividends1.121.1697%
Returns for 1 year9.288.88105%
Returns for 3 years18.0534.8452%
Returns for 5 years20.0337.2354%
Returns for 10 years74.6591.0682%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NVDL33.03N/A
N/A
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
QBUL24.19N/A
N/A
TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF
QCML20.52N/A
N/A
GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF
WLTG37.48-0.14
-0.38%
WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF
GXC87.56-1.23
-1.39%
State Street® SPDR® S&P® China ETF