Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMLSX vs RMFEX
LMLSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LMLSX vs RMFEX
LMLSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMLSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMLSX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LMLSX (2.42B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LMLSX: RMFEX (1.41) vs LMLSX (1.10). LMLSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LMLSX (13 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than LMLSX (0.44). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LMLSX (18.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMLSX: RMFEX (250) vs LMLSX (1000000). LMLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.85 vs. RMFEX (9.45). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.25 vs. LMLSX (20.68).
| LMLSX | RMFEX | LMLSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.62 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.62 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.903 | 9.694 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.42B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.41 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.85 | 9.45 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.66 | 34.42 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.68 | 39.25 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.14 | 100.56 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement