Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMMRX vs RWMFX
LMMRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts LMMRX vs RWMFX
LMMRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMMRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMMRX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. LMMRX (9.19B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than LMMRX: RWMFX (1.40) vs LMMRX (0.80). LMMRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: LMMRX (14 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). LMMRX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). LMMRX (30.00) and RWMFX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. LMMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: LMMRX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. LMMRX (1.60). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. LMMRX (5.66).
| LMMRX | RWMFX | LMMRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.31 | 439% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.31 | 439% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.348 | 5.575 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.19B | 214B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.40 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.60 | 8.10 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.19 | 33.11 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.66 | 26.71 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.03 | 85.42 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement