Advertisement
LMND vs SAFT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMND is a Buy and SAFT is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LMND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LMND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LMND’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LMND’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SAFT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LMND (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +27.74% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +3.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +7.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.36%.
Reported Earning Dates
LMND is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
SAFT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+7.28% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| LMND | SAFT | LMND / SAFT | |
| Capitalization | 5.49B | 1.14B | 483% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.478 | -1.010 | -47% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 16.70 | - |
| Revenue | 845M | 1.27B | 67% |
| Total Cash | 578M | 753M | 77% |
| Total Debt | 200M | 61.1M | 327% |
LMND | SAFT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 78 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SAFT's Valuation (11) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for LMND (92) in the null industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew significantly faster than LMND’s over the last 12 months.
SAFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as LMND (100) in the null industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to LMND’s over the last 12 months.
SAFT's SMR Rating (80) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as LMND (100) in the null industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to LMND’s over the last 12 months.
LMND's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SAFT (50) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that LMND’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
SAFT's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMND (100) in the null industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMND’s over the last 12 months.
| LMND | SAFT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 41% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | 16 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 32% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EFV | 77.85 | 1.45 | +1.90% |
| iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | |||
| EUM | 16.13 | 0.21 | +1.32% |
| ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets | |||
| BRTR | 50.29 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Total Return Active ETF | |||
| HIMZ | 47.24 | N/A | N/A |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF | |||
| GSEE | 67.71 | -1.01 | -1.47% |
| Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emer Mkt Eq ETF | |||
LMND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMND has been loosely correlated with HIPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMND jumps, then HIPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LMND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMND | 100% | +3.16% | ||
| HIPO - LMND | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| BNT - LMND | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| PLMR - LMND | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TRUP - LMND | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HIG - LMND | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.96% | ||
More | ||||
SAFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been loosely correlated with HMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then HMN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAFT | 100% | N/A | ||
| HMN - SAFT | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| HIG - SAFT | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.96% | ||
| TRV - SAFT | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| MCY - SAFT | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| THG - SAFT | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.24% | ||
More | ||||