Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMNSX vs NAESX
LMNSX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMNSX vs NAESX
LMNSX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMNSX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMNSX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. LMNSX (680M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMNSX: NAESX (1.09) vs LMNSX (0.28). LMNSX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMNSX (32 years) vs NAESX (66 years). LMNSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMNSX: NAESX (0) vs LMNSX (1000000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. LMNSX (6.36). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. LMNSX (3.36).
| LMNSX | NAESX | LMNSX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.17 | 500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.17 | 506% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.686 | 12.982 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 680M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 1.09 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.36 | 13.09 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.35 | 49.57 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.36 | 32.77 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.17 | 152.60 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement