Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMNSX vs NAESX
LMNSX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMNSX vs NAESX
LMNSX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMNSX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMNSX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. LMNSX (730M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMNSX: NAESX (1.08) vs LMNSX (0.29). LMNSX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMNSX (32 years) vs NAESX (66 years). LMNSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMNSX: NAESX (0) vs LMNSX (1000000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.66 vs. LMNSX (22.36). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 33.59 vs. LMNSX (-1.34).
| LMNSX | NAESX | LMNSX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.17 | 500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.17 | 506% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.174 | 15.348 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 730M | 183B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.08 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.36 | 27.66 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.17 | 57.38 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.34 | 33.59 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.92 | 172.93 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement