Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMNSX vs NAESX
LMNSX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMNSX vs NAESX
LMNSX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMNSX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMNSX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. LMNSX (708M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMNSX: NAESX (1.10) vs LMNSX (0.28). LMNSX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMNSX (32 years) vs NAESX (66 years). LMNSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMNSX: NAESX (0) vs LMNSX (1000000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.75 vs. LMNSX (15.29). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 42.07 vs. LMNSX (9.02).
| LMNSX | NAESX | LMNSX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.17 | 500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.17 | 506% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.714 | 18.339 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 708M | 183B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 1.10 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.29 | 24.75 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.12 | 58.17 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.02 | 42.07 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.83 | 156.41 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement