Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMNVX vs RMFCX
LMNVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LMNVX vs RMFCX
LMNVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMNVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMNVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LMNVX (4.22B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LMNVX: RMFCX (1.16) vs LMNVX (1.05). LMNVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LMNVX (32 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LMNVX (0.76). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LMNVX (0.53). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMNVX: RMFCX (250) vs LMNVX (1000000). LMNVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.79 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. LMNVX (12.58).
| LMNVX | RMFCX | LMNVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.91 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.91 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.769 | 9.137 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.22B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.16 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.79 | 8.88 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.87 | 34.84 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.58 | 37.23 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.92 | 91.06 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement