Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMRNX vs RLBCX
LMRNX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts LMRNX vs RLBCX
1919 Socially Responsive Balanced I
Price$33.49
Change+$0.09 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets923.51M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.48
Change+$0.14 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
LMRNX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMRNX vs. RLBCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMRNX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. LMRNX (924M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than LMRNX: RLBCX (1.56) vs LMRNX (0.93). LMRNX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: LMRNX (17 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than LMRNX (0.70). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. LMRNX (10.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMRNX: RLBCX (250) vs LMRNX (1000000). LMRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.51 vs. RLBCX (7.72). LMRNX return over 5 years is better than : 46.08 vs. RLBCX (35.59).
| LMRNX | RLBCX | LMRNX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.89 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.89 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.532 | 10.391 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 924M | 255B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.56 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.51 | 7.72 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.61 | 34.49 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.08 | 35.59 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.47 | 70.88 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement