Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMRNX vs RLBCX
LMRNX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts LMRNX vs RLBCX
1919 Socially Responsive Balanced I
Price$34.03
Change+$0.10 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets932.14M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.54
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
LMRNX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMRNX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMRNX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. LMRNX (932M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than LMRNX: RLBCX (1.46) vs LMRNX (0.98). LMRNX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: LMRNX (17 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than LMRNX (0.70). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. LMRNX (12.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMRNX: RLBCX (250) vs LMRNX (1000000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.62 vs. LMRNX (7.89). LMRNX return over 5 years is better than : 47.40 vs. RLBCX (36.95).
| LMRNX | RLBCX | LMRNX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.89 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.89 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.494 | 13.744 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 932M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.46 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.89 | 8.62 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.19 | 39.76 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.40 | 36.95 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.14 | 67.89 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement