Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMRNX vs RLBCX
LMRNX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts LMRNX vs RLBCX
LMRNX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMRNX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMRNX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. LMRNX (929M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than LMRNX: RLBCX (1.52) vs LMRNX (0.95). LMRNX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: LMRNX (18 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than LMRNX (0.69). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. LMRNX (11.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMRNX: RLBCX (250) vs LMRNX (1000000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.31 vs. LMRNX (12.86). LMRNX return over 5 years is better than : 41.63 vs. RLBCX (33.59).
| LMRNX | RLBCX | LMRNX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.89 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.89 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.077 | 9.550 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 929M | 279B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.52 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.86 | 17.31 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.72 | 44.11 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.63 | 33.59 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.46 | 82.12 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement