Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMRNX vs RLBEX
LMRNX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts LMRNX vs RLBEX
LMRNX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMRNX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMRNX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. LMRNX (929M). RLBEX pays higher dividends than LMRNX: RLBEX (1.77) vs LMRNX (0.95). LMRNX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: LMRNX (18 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). LMRNX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. LMRNX (11.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMRNX: RLBEX (250) vs LMRNX (1000000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.71 vs. LMRNX (12.86). LMRNX return over 5 years is better than : 41.63 vs. RLBEX (35.34).
| LMRNX | RLBEX | LMRNX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.60 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.60 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.077 | 9.691 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 929M | 279B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.77 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.86 | 17.71 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.72 | 45.48 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.63 | 35.34 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.46 | 88.34 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement