Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMRNX vs RLBFX
LMRNX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts LMRNX vs RLBFX
LMRNX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMRNX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMRNX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. LMRNX (898M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than LMRNX: RLBFX (2.03) vs LMRNX (0.96). LMRNX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: LMRNX (18 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). LMRNX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. LMRNX (11.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMRNX: RLBFX (250) vs LMRNX (1000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.47 vs. LMRNX (6.95). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.05 vs. LMRNX (31.77).
| LMRNX | RLBFX | LMRNX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.30 | 230% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.30 | 230% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.816 | 9.778 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 898M | 283B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 2.03 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.95 | 9.47 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.82 | 44.21 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.77 | 34.05 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.02 | 89.30 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers