Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMSAX vs NAESX
LMSAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMSAX vs NAESX
ClearBridge Small Cap A
Price$38.42
Change-$0.59 (-1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets711.6M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$114.57
Change-$1.97 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
LMSAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMSAX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMSAX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. LMSAX (712M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMSAX: NAESX (1.28) vs LMSAX (1.02). LMSAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMSAX (16 years) vs NAESX (65 years). LMSAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). LMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: LMSAX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.99 vs. LMSAX (-2.12). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 65.54 vs. LMSAX (23.22).
| LMSAX | NAESX | LMSAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.17 | 629% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.17 | 647% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.738 | 1.363 | -54% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 712M | 153B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.28 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.12 | 6.99 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.28 | 37.15 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.22 | 65.54 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.33 | 106.51 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement