Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMSAX vs NAESX
LMSAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMSAX vs NAESX
LMSAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMSAX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMSAX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. LMSAX (730M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMSAX: NAESX (1.08) vs LMSAX (0.39). LMSAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMSAX (17 years) vs NAESX (66 years). LMSAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMSAX: NAESX (0) vs LMSAX (1000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.66 vs. LMSAX (17.04). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 33.59 vs. LMSAX (-14.70).
| LMSAX | NAESX | LMSAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.17 | 629% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.17 | 665% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.046 | 15.348 | 85% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 730M | 183B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.08 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.04 | 27.66 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.48 | 57.38 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.70 | 33.59 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.90 | 172.93 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement