Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMSAX vs NAESX
LMSAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMSAX vs NAESX
LMSAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMSAX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMSAX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. LMSAX (708M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMSAX: NAESX (1.10) vs LMSAX (0.37). LMSAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMSAX (18 years) vs NAESX (66 years). LMSAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMSAX: NAESX (0) vs LMSAX (1000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.75 vs. LMSAX (10.28). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 42.07 vs. LMSAX (-5.74).
| LMSAX | NAESX | LMSAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.17 | 629% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.17 | 665% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.539 | 18.339 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 708M | 183B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 1.10 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.28 | 24.75 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.35 | 58.17 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.74 | 42.07 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.78 | 156.41 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers