Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMSIX vs NAESX
LMSIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMSIX vs NAESX
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity I
Price$16.18
Change+$0.17 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets120.84M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$123.61
Change+$1.12 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
LMSIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMSIX vs. NAESX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMSIX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. LMSIX (121M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMSIX: NAESX (1.23) vs LMSIX (0.51). LMSIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMSIX (26 years) vs NAESX (65 years). LMSIX (1.09) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMSIX: NAESX (3000) vs LMSIX (1000000). LMSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.96 vs. NAESX (9.13). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 56.51 vs. LMSIX (38.24).
| LMSIX | NAESX | LMSIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.17 | 588% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.17 | 641% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.763 | 6.604 | 239% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 121M | 162B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.23 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.96 | 9.13 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.50 | 47.05 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.24 | 56.51 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.05 | 131.38 | 20% |