Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMSIX vs NAESX
LMSIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMSIX vs NAESX
LMSIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMSIX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMSIX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. LMSIX (148M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMSIX: NAESX (1.07) vs LMSIX (0.28). LMSIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMSIX (26 years) vs NAESX (66 years). LMSIX (1.01) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMSIX: NAESX (0) vs LMSIX (1000000). LMSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.21 vs. NAESX (23.34). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 38.39 vs. LMSIX (16.76).
| LMSIX | NAESX | LMSIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.17 | 588% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.17 | 594% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.159 | 15.738 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148M | 189B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 1.07 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.21 | 23.34 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.50 | 48.12 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.76 | 38.39 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.08 | 157.36 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement