| LMUB | PZA | LMUB / PZA | |
| Gain YTD | -2.305 | -2.192 | 105% |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 4.15B | 43% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.28 | 32% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 6.00 | 183% |
| Yield | 3.90 | 3.84 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 19 years | - |
| LMUB | PZA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 22% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 5 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 69% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PZA and NIQ have been poorly correlated (+-6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PZA and NIQ's prices will move in lockstep.