Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMVRX vs RWEBX
LMVRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LMVRX vs RWEBX
LMVRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMVRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMVRX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. LMVRX (4.26B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than LMVRX: RWEBX (0.75) vs LMVRX (0.60). LMVRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LMVRX (20 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). LMVRX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. LMVRX (0.53). LMVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: LMVRX (0) vs RWEBX (250). LMVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.07 vs. RWEBX (6.15). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.77 vs. LMVRX (8.79).
| LMVRX | RWEBX | LMVRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.06 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.06 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.742 | 4.539 | 303% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.26B | 219B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.75 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.07 | 6.15 | 245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.53 | 25.02 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.79 | 24.77 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.34 | 73.76 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers