Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMVRX vs RWEBX
LMVRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LMVRX vs RWEBX
LMVRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMVRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jul 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMVRX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LMVRX (4.23B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than LMVRX: RWEBX (0.76) vs LMVRX (0.62). LMVRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LMVRX (20 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). LMVRX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. LMVRX (0.53). LMVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: LMVRX (0) vs RWEBX (250). LMVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.91 vs. RWEBX (4.77). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.10 vs. LMVRX (5.26).
| LMVRX | RWEBX | LMVRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.06 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.06 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.508 | 3.701 | 338% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.23B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.76 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.91 | 4.77 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.44 | 27.94 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.26 | 24.10 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.37 | 72.03 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement