Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMVRX vs RWEBX
LMVRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LMVRX vs RWEBX
LMVRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMVRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMVRX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LMVRX (4.32B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than LMVRX: RWEBX (0.74) vs LMVRX (0.59). LMVRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LMVRX (20 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). LMVRX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LMVRX (0.53). LMVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: LMVRX (0) vs RWEBX (250). LMVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.16 vs. RWEBX (2.85). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.37 vs. LMVRX (11.31).
| LMVRX | RWEBX | LMVRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.06 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.06 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.007 | 3.887 | 412% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.32B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.74 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.16 | 2.85 | 427% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.31 | 27.25 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.31 | 23.37 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.61 | 74.70 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement