LNC
Price
$41.09
Change
+$0.74 (+1.83%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.79B
25 days until earnings call
MFC
Price
$31.96
Change
+$0.55 (+1.75%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
54.09B
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LNC vs MFC

Header iconLNC vs MFC Comparison
Open Charts LNC vs MFCBanner chart's image
Lincoln National
Price$41.09
Change+$0.74 (+1.83%)
Volume$1.69M
Capitalization7.79B
Manulife Financial
Price$31.96
Change+$0.55 (+1.75%)
Volume$1.33M
Capitalization54.09B
LNC vs MFC Comparison Chart in %
LNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNC vs. MFC commentary
Oct 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNC is a Hold and MFC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 05, 2025
Stock price -- (LNC: $41.09 vs. MFC: $31.96)
Brand notoriety: LNC: Notable vs. MFC: Not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNC: 87% vs. MFC: 63%
Market capitalization -- LNC: $7.79B vs. MFC: $54.09B
LNC [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $7.79B. MFC’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $54.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $137B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFC is a better buy in the long-term than LNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFC is a better buy in the short-term than LNC.

Price Growth

LNC (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +1.03% price change this week, while MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +3.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

LNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

MFC is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-1.11% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFC($54.1B) has a higher market cap than LNC($7.79B). MFC has higher P/E ratio than LNC: MFC (14.11) vs LNC (6.74). LNC YTD gains are higher at: 35.047 vs. MFC (4.070). LNC has more cash in the bank: 30.1B vs. MFC (23.8B). LNC has less debt than MFC: LNC (5.77B) vs MFC (13.3B). MFC has higher revenues than LNC: MFC (47.5B) vs LNC (18.1B).
LNCMFCLNC / MFC
Capitalization7.79B54.1B14%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD35.0474.070861%
P/E Ratio6.7414.1148%
Revenue18.1B47.5B38%
Total Cash30.1B23.8B126%
Total Debt5.77B13.3B43%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNC vs MFC: Fundamental Ratings
LNC
MFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5632
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7714
SMR RATING
1..100
9799
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10075
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LNC's Valuation (18) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (32). This means that LNC’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNC (77). This means that MFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNC’s over the last 12 months.

LNC's SMR Rating (97) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (99). This means that LNC’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

LNC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (52). This means that LNC’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as LNC (100). This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to LNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNCMFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RPEBX72.000.15
+0.21%
American Funds New Perspective R2E
JDWAX131.610.23
+0.18%
Janus Henderson Global Research A
HCYIX18.670.02
+0.11%
Hilton Tactical Income Instl
ECLCX32.24-0.07
-0.22%
Eaton Vance Growth C
UOPIX142.21-1.23
-0.86%
ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Inv

LNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNC has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNC jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNC
1D Price
Change %
LNC100%
+1.83%
PRU - LNC
81%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
CNO - LNC
80%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
MET - LNC
78%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
JXN - LNC
78%
Closely correlated
+2.52%
PRI - LNC
70%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
More

MFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFC has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFC jumps, then MET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFC
1D Price
Change %
MFC100%
+1.75%
MET - MFC
75%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
PRU - MFC
72%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
LNC - MFC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
PRI - MFC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
JXN - MFC
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.52%
More