Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNGZX vs TRCLX
LNGZX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs TRCLX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$50.26
Change-$0.58 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.56M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.70
Change-$0.10 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.27M
LNGZX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 63.3M vs. LNGZX (54.6M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: TRCLX (1.39) vs LNGZX (0.96). LNGZX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: LNGZX (28 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than LNGZX (1.39). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. LNGZX (40.00). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: LNGZX (2000) vs TRCLX (500000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.81 vs. TRCLX (26.80). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.81 vs. LNGZX (-28.34).
| LNGZX | TRCLX | LNGZX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.03 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 2.10 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.317 | 29.735 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.6M | 63.3M | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.39 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.81 | 26.80 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.45 | 28.94 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.34 | 1.81 | -1,565% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement