Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNGZX vs TRCLX
LNGZX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs TRCLX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$41.95
Change-$0.83 (-1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.76M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.52
Change-$0.14 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.03M
LNGZX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNGZX (47.8M) and TRCLX (46M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . TRCLX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: TRCLX (1.69) vs LNGZX (1.10). LNGZX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: LNGZX (28 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than LNGZX (1.39). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. LNGZX (40.00). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: LNGZX (2000) vs TRCLX (500000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.86 vs. TRCLX (9.21). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.22 vs. LNGZX (-26.58).
| LNGZX | TRCLX | LNGZX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.03 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 2.10 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.029 | 10.417 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.8M | 46M | 104% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.69 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.86 | 9.21 | 248% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.12 | 0.41 | -761% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.58 | 1.22 | -2,177% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement