Ad is loading...
LNGZX vs TRCLX
LNGZX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs TRCLX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$36.91
Change-$0.12 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.04
Change+$0.03 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LNGZX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX (48.4M) and LNGZX (46.1M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . TRCLX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: TRCLX (2.49) vs LNGZX (0.69). LNGZX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: LNGZX (28 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. TRCLX (54.60). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: LNGZX (2000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.56 vs. LNGZX (7.96).
| LNGZX | TRCLX | LNGZX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.435 | 13.622 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.1M | 48.4M | 95% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 2.49 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.96 | 13.56 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | -42.71 | -36.33 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.16 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ATHIX | 31.72 | -0.10 | -0.31% |
| American Century Heritage I | |||
| LGOFX | 28.26 | -0.25 | -0.88% |
| Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities F | |||
| GPGEX | 8.27 | -0.10 | -1.19% |
| Grandeur Peak Global Explorer Instl | |||
| HDAVX | 16.04 | -0.26 | -1.60% |
| Janus Henderson Responsible Intl Div A | |||
| IUERX | 24.96 | -0.53 | -2.08% |
| JPMorgan International Focus R2 | |||