Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNGZX vs TRCLX
LNGZX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs TRCLX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$46.38
Change-$0.75 (-1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.47M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.98
Change-$0.23 (-1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.25M
LNGZX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 59.2M vs. LNGZX (50.5M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: TRCLX (1.39) vs LNGZX (0.96). LNGZX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: LNGZX (28 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than LNGZX (1.39). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. LNGZX (40.00). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: LNGZX (2000) vs TRCLX (500000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.31 vs. TRCLX (38.51). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.49 vs. LNGZX (-34.73).
| LNGZX | TRCLX | LNGZX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.03 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 2.10 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.828 | 25.095 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.5M | 59.2M | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.39 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.31 | 38.51 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.96 | 16.85 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.73 | -5.49 | 632% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement