Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNGZX vs TRCLX
LNGZX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs TRCLX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$42.47
Change-$0.13 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.97M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.83
Change+$0.12 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.7M
LNGZX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNGZX (47M) and TRCLX (46.7M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . TRCLX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: TRCLX (1.61) vs LNGZX (1.05). LNGZX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: LNGZX (28 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than LNGZX (1.39). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. LNGZX (40.00). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: LNGZX (2000) vs TRCLX (500000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.69 vs. TRCLX (14.38). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -3.76 vs. LNGZX (-32.41).
| LNGZX | TRCLX | LNGZX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.03 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 2.10 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.189 | 12.027 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47M | 46.7M | 101% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.61 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.69 | 14.38 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.09 | -8.08 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.41 | -3.76 | 862% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement