Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNGZX vs TRCLX
LNGZX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs TRCLX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$44.93
Change-$0.34 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.68M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.37
Change-$0.03 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.18M
LNGZX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 53.2M vs. LNGZX (49.7M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: TRCLX (1.61) vs LNGZX (1.05). LNGZX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: LNGZX (28 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than LNGZX (1.39). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. LNGZX (40.00). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: LNGZX (2000) vs TRCLX (500000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.19 vs. TRCLX (30.82). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -2.09 vs. LNGZX (-31.82).
| LNGZX | TRCLX | LNGZX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.03 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 2.10 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.783 | 17.424 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.7M | 53.2M | 93% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.61 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.19 | 30.82 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.87 | 4.27 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.82 | -2.09 | 1,522% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement