Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNGZX vs TRCLX
LNGZX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs TRCLX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$42.70
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.05M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.32
Change-$0.03 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.97M
LNGZX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNGZX has more cash in the bank: 48.1M vs. TRCLX (44M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: TRCLX (1.71) vs LNGZX (1.13). LNGZX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: LNGZX (28 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than LNGZX (1.39). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. LNGZX (40.00). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: LNGZX (2000) vs TRCLX (500000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.77 vs. TRCLX (2.62). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 5.43 vs. LNGZX (-20.03).
| LNGZX | TRCLX | LNGZX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.03 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 2.10 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.785 | 7.481 | 211% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.1M | 44M | 109% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.71 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.77 | 2.62 | 639% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.10 | 1.40 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.03 | 5.43 | -369% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement