Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNGZX vs TRCLX
LNGZX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs TRCLX
LNGZX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNGZX vs. TRCLX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNGZX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 108M vs. LNGZX (41.5M). LNGZX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: LNGZX (2.07) vs TRCLX (1.27). LNGZX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: LNGZX (29 years) vs TRCLX (7 years). TRCLX (1.73) is less costly to investors than LNGZX (1.49). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.10 vs. LNGZX (48.00). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: LNGZX (2000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.99 vs. LNGZX (-13.39). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 6.24 vs. LNGZX (-35.10).
| LNGZX | TRCLX | LNGZX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.03 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.73 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.271 | 25.371 | -40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.5M | 108M | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 1.27 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.39 | 33.99 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.11 | 77.78 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.10 | 6.24 | -563% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers