Ad is loading...
LNNGY
Price
$51.75
Change
-$0.04 (-0.08%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
NCBDF
Price
$21.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 25 closing price
Ad is loading...

LNNGY vs NCBDF

Header iconLNNGY vs NCBDF Comparison
Open Charts LNNGY vs NCBDFBanner chart's image
Li Ning
Price$51.75
Change-$0.04 (-0.08%)
Volume$17.79K
CapitalizationN/A
Bandai Namco Holdings
Price$21.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.02K
CapitalizationN/A
LNNGY vs NCBDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LNNGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNNGY vs. NCBDF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNNGY is a StrongSell and NCBDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (LNNGY: $51.75 vs. NCBDF: $21.20)
Brand notoriety: LNNGY and NCBDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNNGY: 132% vs. NCBDF: 48%
Market capitalization -- LNNGY: $15.89B vs. NCBDF: $15.07B
LNNGY [@Recreational Products] is valued at $15.89B. NCBDF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $15.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNNGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNCBDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LNNGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NCBDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LNNGY is a better buy in the long-term than NCBDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNNGY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LNNGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

LNNGY (@Recreational Products) experienced а -3.58% price change this week, while NCBDF (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -5.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-5.12% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNNGY($15.9B) has a higher market cap than NCBDF($15.1B). LNNGY has higher P/E ratio than NCBDF: LNNGY (26.32) vs NCBDF (22.62). NCBDF YTD gains are higher at: 9.053 vs. LNNGY (-16.486). NCBDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 158B vs. LNNGY (6.97B). NCBDF has higher revenues than LNNGY: NCBDF (990B) vs LNNGY (25.8B).
LNNGYNCBDFLNNGY / NCBDF
Capitalization15.9B15.1B105%
EBITDA6.97B158B4%
Gain YTD-16.4869.053-182%
P/E Ratio26.3222.62116%
Revenue25.8B990B3%
Total CashN/A280B-
Total DebtN/A10.8B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNNGY vs NCBDF: Fundamental Ratings
LNNGY
NCBDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
1656
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5458
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8392
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LNNGY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCBDF (86). This means that LNNGY’s stock grew significantly faster than NCBDF’s over the last 12 months.

NCBDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as LNNGY (100). This means that NCBDF’s stock grew similarly to LNNGY’s over the last 12 months.

LNNGY's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCBDF (56). This means that LNNGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCBDF’s over the last 12 months.

LNNGY's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as NCBDF (58). This means that LNNGY’s stock grew similarly to NCBDF’s over the last 12 months.

LNNGY's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as NCBDF (92). This means that LNNGY’s stock grew similarly to NCBDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNNGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LNNGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSCOX20.71-0.13
-0.62%
Fidelity International Small Cap Opp
RPMVX18.61-0.23
-1.22%
Reinhart Mid Cap PMV Adv
SUWCX33.97-0.46
-1.34%
DWS Core Equity C
MSCDX19.60-0.27
-1.36%
MassMutual Small Cap Opps R5
LCAGX13.63-0.20
-1.45%
Lord Abbett International Growth C

LNNGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNNGY has been closely correlated with ANPDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNNGY jumps, then ANPDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNNGY
1D Price
Change %
LNNGY100%
-0.08%
ANPDY - LNNGY
74%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
ANPDF - LNNGY
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAS - LNNGY
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
SMNNY - LNNGY
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
MCFT - LNNGY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
More

NCBDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCBDF and NCBDY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCBDF and NCBDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCBDF
1D Price
Change %
NCBDF100%
N/A
NCBDY - NCBDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
ANPDF - NCBDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NINOY - NCBDF
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
OLCLF - NCBDF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNNGY - NCBDF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
More