Ad is loading...
LOGVX vs MFBHX
LOGVX vs MFBHX Comparison
Open Charts LOGVX vs MFBHX
Lord Abbett Income F3
Price$2.40
Change+$0.01 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.63B
MFS Corporate Bond R3
Price$12.27
Change+$0.05 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.51B
LOGVX vs MFBHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOGVX vs. MFBHX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOGVX is a Hold and MFBHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOGVX has more cash in the bank: 5.63B vs. MFBHX (4.51B). LOGVX pays higher dividends than MFBHX: LOGVX (5.78) vs MFBHX (4.48). LOGVX was incepted earlier than MFBHX: LOGVX (8 years) vs MFBHX (20 years). MFBHX (0.78) is less costly to investors than LOGVX (0.46). LOGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 190.00 vs. MFBHX (59.00). LOGVX (0) and MFBHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFBHX (7.49) and LOGVX (7.31) have marching annual gain over last year. LOGVX return over 5 years is better than : 10.18 vs. MFBHX (-2.16).
| LOGVX | MFBHX | LOGVX / MFBHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.77 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.78 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.065 | 1.473 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.63B | 4.51B | 125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.78 | 4.48 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.31 | 7.49 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.01 | 7.29 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.18 | -2.16 | -472% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers