Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOGVX vs MFBHX
LOGVX vs MFBHX Comparison
Open Charts LOGVX vs MFBHX
LOGVX vs MFBHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOGVX vs. MFBHX commentary
Aug 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOGVX is a Hold and MFBHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOGVX has more cash in the bank: 6.39B vs. MFBHX (4.36B). LOGVX pays higher dividends than MFBHX: LOGVX (5.74) vs MFBHX (4.59). LOGVX was incepted earlier than MFBHX: LOGVX (9 years) vs MFBHX (21 years). MFBHX (0.77) is less costly to investors than LOGVX (0.44). LOGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. MFBHX (41.00). LOGVX (0) and MFBHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LOGVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.73 vs. MFBHX (1.72). LOGVX return over 5 years is better than : 1.18 vs. MFBHX (-5.02).
| LOGVX | MFBHX | LOGVX / MFBHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.76 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.77 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.481 | -0.759 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.39B | 4.36B | 147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.74 | 4.59 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.73 | 1.72 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.12 | 15.64 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.18 | -5.02 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement