Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOGVX vs MFBHX
LOGVX vs MFBHX Comparison
Open Charts LOGVX vs MFBHX
LOGVX vs MFBHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOGVX vs. MFBHX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOGVX is a Hold and MFBHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOGVX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. MFBHX (4.28B). LOGVX pays higher dividends than MFBHX: LOGVX (5.73) vs MFBHX (4.56). LOGVX was incepted earlier than MFBHX: LOGVX (9 years) vs MFBHX (21 years). MFBHX (0.77) is less costly to investors than LOGVX (0.44). LOGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. MFBHX (41.00). LOGVX (0) and MFBHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LOGVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.21 vs. MFBHX (-0.88). LOGVX return over 5 years is better than : 0.11 vs. MFBHX (-5.57).
| LOGVX | MFBHX | LOGVX / MFBHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.76 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.77 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.265 | -1.448 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.28B | 4.28B | 147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.73 | 4.56 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.21 | -0.88 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.65 | 16.19 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.11 | -5.57 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement