Ad is loading...
LOLDX vs LSCOX
LOLDX vs LSCOX Comparison
Open Charts LOLDX vs LSCOX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income F3
Price$3.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.08B
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond F3
Price$9.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets587.37M
LOLDX vs LSCOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOLDX vs. LSCOX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOLDX is a Hold and LSCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOLDX has more cash in the bank: 42.1B vs. LSCOX (587M). LOLDX (5.23) and LSCOX (4.99) have matching dividends . LOLDX was incepted earlier than LSCOX: LOLDX (8 years) vs LSCOX (8 years). LSCOX (0.43) is less costly to investors than LOLDX (0.32). LOLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. LSCOX (78.00). LOLDX (0) and LSCOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LOLDX (6.78) and LSCOX (6.76) have marching annual gain over last year. LOLDX return over 5 years is better than : 16.32 vs. LSCOX (14.39).
| LOLDX | LSCOX | LOLDX / LSCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.31 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.43 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.573 | 1.750 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.1B | 587M | 7,172% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.23 | 4.99 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | 6.76 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.72 | 12.86 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.32 | 14.39 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...