Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOMAX vs RMEBX
LOMAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LOMAX vs RMEBX
LOMAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOMAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOMAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LOMAX (172M). LOMAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LOMAX (2.34) vs RMEBX (0.99). LOMAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LOMAX (29 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) and LOMAX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . LOMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.76 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LOMAX: RMEBX (250) vs LOMAX (2500). LOMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.02 vs. RMEBX (8.96). LOMAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.74 vs. RMEBX (36.13).
| LOMAX | RMEBX | LOMAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.211 | 9.416 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.34 | 0.99 | 236% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.02 | 8.96 | 268% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.30 | 32.63 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.74 | 36.13 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.86 | 90.64 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers