Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOMAX vs RMEBX
LOMAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LOMAX vs RMEBX
LOMAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOMAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOMAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LOMAX (164M). LOMAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LOMAX (2.47) vs RMEBX (1.04). LOMAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LOMAX (29 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) and LOMAX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . LOMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.76 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LOMAX: RMEBX (250) vs LOMAX (2500). LOMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.08 vs. RMEBX (10.14). LOMAX (36.93) and RMEBX (35.62) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LOMAX | RMEBX | LOMAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.124 | 6.444 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 1.04 | 239% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.08 | 10.14 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.26 | 34.54 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.93 | 35.62 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.73 | 94.57 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement