Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOMAX vs RMFCX
LOMAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LOMAX vs RMFCX
LOMAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOMAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOMAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LOMAX (177M). LOMAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LOMAX (2.34) vs RMFCX (1.15). LOMAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LOMAX (29 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LOMAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LOMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.76 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LOMAX: RMFCX (250) vs LOMAX (2500). LOMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.74 vs. RMFCX (9.14). LOMAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.82 vs. RMFCX (36.70).
| LOMAX | RMFCX | LOMAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.317 | 10.454 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.34 | 1.15 | 203% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.74 | 9.14 | 260% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.85 | 38.82 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.82 | 36.70 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.31 | 92.27 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers