Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOMAX vs RMFCX
LOMAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LOMAX vs RMFCX
LOMAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOMAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOMAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LOMAX (164M). LOMAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LOMAX (2.47) vs RMFCX (1.19). LOMAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LOMAX (29 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LOMAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LOMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.76 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LOMAX: RMFCX (250) vs LOMAX (2500). LOMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.08 vs. RMFCX (10.30). LOMAX (36.93) and RMFCX (36.58) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LOMAX | RMFCX | LOMAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.124 | 6.522 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 1.19 | 208% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.08 | 10.30 | 195% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.26 | 35.10 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.93 | 36.58 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.73 | 96.37 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement