LOW
Price
$223.63
Change
+$2.40 (+1.08%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
145.75B
53 days until earnings call
VRM
Price
$28.51
Change
-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
24.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LOW vs VRM

Header iconLOW vs VRM Comparison
Open Charts LOW vs VRMBanner chart's image
Lowe's Companies
Price$223.63
Change+$2.40 (+1.08%)
Volume$3.26M
Capitalization145.75B
Vroom
Price$28.51
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Volume$118.14K
Capitalization24.1M
LOW vs VRM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOW vs. VRM commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOW is a StrongBuy and VRM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (LOW: $223.63 vs. VRM: $27.74)
Brand notoriety: LOW: Notable vs. VRM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOW: 116% vs. VRM: 901%
Market capitalization -- LOW: $145.75B vs. VRM: $24.1M
LOW [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $145.75B. VRM’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $24.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileVRM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LOW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • VRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOW is a better buy in the long-term than VRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOW’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LOW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

LOW (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +5.11% price change this week, while VRM (@Specialty Stores) price change was -12.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOW is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.

VRM is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+2.57% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOW($146B) has a higher market cap than VRM($24.1M). LOW has higher P/E ratio than VRM: LOW (18.88) vs VRM (13.28). VRM YTD gains are higher at: 453.693 vs. LOW (-8.512). LOW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.6B vs. VRM (-276M). LOW has more cash in the bank: 921M vs. VRM (140M). VRM has less debt than LOW: VRM (1.23B) vs LOW (40.1B). LOW has higher revenues than VRM: LOW (86.4B) vs VRM (893M).
LOWVRMLOW / VRM
Capitalization146B24.1M605,809%
EBITDA13.6B-276M-4,927%
Gain YTD-8.512453.693-2%
P/E Ratio18.8813.28142%
Revenue86.4B893M9,675%
Total Cash921M140M658%
Total Debt40.1B1.23B3,252%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOW: Fundamental Ratings
LOW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33
SMR RATING
1..100
8
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BVS6.770.11
+1.65%
Bioventus
DV14.840.10
+0.68%
DoubleVerify Holdings
ETNB9.85-0.10
-1.01%
89bio
SCCO102.51-2.13
-2.04%
Southern Copper Corp
HOWL1.04-0.15
-12.55%
Werewolf Therapeutics

VRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRM has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRM jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRM
1D Price
Change %
VRM100%
-2.73%
HNST - VRM
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
CPRT - VRM
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
CVNA - VRM
33%
Poorly correlated
+4.17%
LE - VRM
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
LOW - VRM
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
More