Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPERX vs RSLFX
LPERX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts LPERX vs RSLFX
LPERX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPERX vs. RSLFX commentary
Jun 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPERX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 88.9B vs. LPERX (44M). LPERX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: LPERX (8.29) vs RSLFX (0.84). LPERX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: LPERX (18 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). LPERX (2.15) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LPERX (31.00). LPERX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSLFX: LPERX (0) vs RSLFX (250). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.79 vs. LPERX (-18.57). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.90 vs. LPERX (-20.25).
| LPERX | RSLFX | LPERX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.70 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.70 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.964 | 13.211 | -53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44M | 88.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.29 | 0.84 | 983% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.57 | 20.79 | -89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.50 | 39.53 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.25 | -0.90 | 2,251% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.48 | 95.25 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement