Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPERX vs RSLFX
LPERX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts LPERX vs RSLFX
LPERX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPERX vs. RSLFX commentary
Jul 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPERX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. LPERX (42.5M). LPERX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: LPERX (8.51) vs RSLFX (0.79). LPERX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: LPERX (19 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). LPERX (2.15) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LPERX (31.00). LPERX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSLFX: LPERX (0) vs RSLFX (250). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.33 vs. LPERX (-22.15). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : -1.29 vs. LPERX (-23.70).
| LPERX | RSLFX | LPERX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.70 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.70 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.635 | 15.244 | -57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.5M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.51 | 0.79 | 1,083% |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.15 | 17.33 | -128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.94 | 38.74 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.70 | -1.29 | 1,842% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.73 | 104.22 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement