Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPERX vs RSLFX
LPERX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts LPERX vs RSLFX
LPERX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPERX vs. RSLFX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPERX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. LPERX (41.9M). LPERX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: LPERX (7.91) vs RSLFX (0.81). LPERX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: LPERX (19 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). LPERX (2.15) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LPERX (31.00). LPERX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSLFX: LPERX (0) vs RSLFX (250). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.44 vs. LPERX (-21.69). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : -9.48 vs. LPERX (-25.68).
| LPERX | RSLFX | LPERX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.70 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.70 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.685 | 10.167 | -66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.9M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.91 | 0.81 | 974% |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.69 | 7.44 | -291% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.42 | 36.49 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.68 | -9.48 | 271% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.33 | 84.63 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement