Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFAX vs SCWFX
LPFAX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts LPFAX vs SCWFX
LPFAX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFAX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFAX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.9B vs. LPFAX (44.6M). LPFAX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: LPFAX (5.54) vs SCWFX (0.59). LPFAX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: LPFAX (8 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). LPFAX (2.02) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). SCWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LPFAX (31.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFAX: SCWFX (250) vs LPFAX (2500). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.36 vs. LPFAX (-13.61). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.29 vs. LPFAX (-10.10).
| LPFAX | SCWFX | LPFAX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 1.07 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 1.07 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.206 | 12.049 | -52% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.6M | 88.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.54 | 0.59 | 934% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.61 | 20.36 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.77 | 37.07 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.10 | -3.29 | 307% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement