Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFAX vs SFCWX
LPFAX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts LPFAX vs SFCWX
ALPS Global Opportunity A
Price$6.85
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.3M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$75.58
Change+$0.38 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.4B
LPFAX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFAX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFAX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 79.4B vs. LPFAX (59.3M). LPFAX pays higher dividends than SFCWX: LPFAX (11.03) vs SFCWX (0.94). LPFAX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: LPFAX (7 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). LPFAX (2.72) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). LPFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). LPFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: LPFAX (2500) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.24 vs. LPFAX (7.65). LPFAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.76 vs. SFCWX (21.81).
| LPFAX | SFCWX | LPFAX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 0.65 | 418% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 0.65 | 418% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.047 | 9.778 | 62% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.3M | 79.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.03 | 0.94 | 1,176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.65 | 10.24 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.42 | 33.82 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.76 | 21.81 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement