Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFAX vs SFCWX
LPFAX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts LPFAX vs SFCWX
ALPS Global Opportunity A
Price$6.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.91M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$74.91
Change+$0.44 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.12B
LPFAX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFAX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFAX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 79.1B vs. LPFAX (57.9M). LPFAX pays higher dividends than SFCWX: LPFAX (11.03) vs SFCWX (0.94). LPFAX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: LPFAX (7 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). LPFAX (2.72) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). LPFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). LPFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: LPFAX (2500) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.80 vs. LPFAX (7.12). LPFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.34 vs. SFCWX (23.80).
| LPFAX | SFCWX | LPFAX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 0.65 | 418% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 0.65 | 418% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.721 | 8.805 | 42% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 57.9M | 79.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.03 | 0.94 | 1,176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.12 | 10.80 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.73 | 36.16 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.34 | 23.80 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement