Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFAX vs SFCWX
LPFAX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts LPFAX vs SFCWX
ALPS Global Opportunity A
Price$6.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.44M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$77.48
Change-$0.28 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.91B
LPFAX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFAX vs. SFCWX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFAX is a Hold and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 81.9B vs. LPFAX (57.4M). LPFAX pays higher dividends than SFCWX: LPFAX (10.88) vs SFCWX (0.91). LPFAX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: LPFAX (7 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). LPFAX (2.72) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). LPFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). LPFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: LPFAX (2500) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.93 vs. LPFAX (1.88). LPFAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.43 vs. SFCWX (18.60).
| LPFAX | SFCWX | LPFAX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 0.65 | 418% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 0.65 | 418% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.341 | 12.538 | 35% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 57.4M | 81.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 10.88 | 0.91 | 1,195% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.88 | 9.93 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.80 | 38.43 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.43 | 18.60 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement