Ad is loading...
LPFAX vs SFCWX
LPFAX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts LPFAX vs SFCWX
ALPS Global Opportunity A
Price$6.26
Change+$0.14 (+2.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.58M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$65.07
Change+$1.14 (+1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.94B
LPFAX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFAX vs. SFCWX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFAX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 67.9B vs. LPFAX (58.6M). LPFAX pays higher dividends than SFCWX: LPFAX (11.76) vs SFCWX (1.04). LPFAX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: LPFAX (7 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). LPFAX (2.64) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). LPFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). LPFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: LPFAX (2500) vs SFCWX (1000000). LPFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.11 vs. SFCWX (-1.46). LPFAX return over 5 years is better than : 56.94 vs. SFCWX (30.56).
| LPFAX | SFCWX | LPFAX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.64 | 0.65 | 406% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.64 | 0.65 | 406% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.116 | -5.518 | 93% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.6M | 67.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.76 | 1.04 | 1,127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.11 | -1.46 | -144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.61 | 2.37 | 744% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.94 | 30.56 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...