Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LQFLX vs RMEBX
LQFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LQFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R3
Price$15.21
Change+$0.04 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.16M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.55
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
LQFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LQFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQFLX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LQFLX (68.2M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LQFLX: RMEBX (1.05) vs LQFLX (0.31). LQFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LQFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LQFLX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LQFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LQFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LQFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LQFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.96 vs. RMEBX (7.29). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.63 vs. LQFLX (13.21).
| LQFLX | RMEBX | LQFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.07 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.156 | 14.812 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.2M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.05 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.96 | 7.29 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.70 | 43.24 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.21 | 59.63 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement