Ad is loading...
LQFLX vs RMEBX
LQFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LQFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R3
Price$13.18
Change+$0.12 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.17M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.09
Change+$0.08 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.3B
LQFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LQFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQFLX is a Buy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. LQFLX (34.2M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LQFLX: RMEBX (1.18) vs LQFLX (0.35). LQFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LQFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LQFLX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LQFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LQFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LQFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LQFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.19 vs. RMEBX (5.40). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 72.81 vs. LQFLX (45.24).
| LQFLX | RMEBX | LQFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.07 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 2.445 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.2M | 102B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.18 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.19 | 5.40 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.62 | 10.70 | -127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.24 | 72.81 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...