Ad is loading...
LQFLX vs RMEBX
LQFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LQFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R3
Price$13.57
Change+$0.07 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.99M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.08
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
LQFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LQFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQFLX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. LQFLX (33M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LQFLX: RMEBX (1.54) vs LQFLX (0.00). LQFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LQFLX (5 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). LQFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). LQFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LQFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LQFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.78 vs. RMEBX (12.29). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.84 vs. LQFLX (-12.40).
| LQFLX | RMEBX | LQFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.905 | 2.149 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.54 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.78 | 12.29 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.33 | 12.11 | -102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.40 | 36.84 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.72 | - |