Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LQFLX vs RMEBX
LQFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LQFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R3
Price$14.92
Change-$0.04 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.51M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.27
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
LQFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LQFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQFLX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LQFLX (85.5M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LQFLX: RMEBX (1.05) vs LQFLX (0.31). LQFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LQFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LQFLX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LQFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LQFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LQFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LQFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.48 vs. RMEBX (5.45). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.76 vs. LQFLX (0.06).
| LQFLX | RMEBX | LQFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.07 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.548 | 12.462 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.5M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.05 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.48 | 5.45 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.83 | 27.22 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.06 | 50.76 | 0% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement