Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LQFLX vs RMEBX
LQFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LQFLX vs RMEBX
LQFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LQFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQFLX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LQFLX (161M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LQFLX: RMEBX (0.99) vs LQFLX (0.03). LQFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LQFLX (7 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). LQFLX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LQFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LQFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LQFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LQFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.48 vs. RMEBX (4.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. LQFLX (-9.38).
| LQFLX | RMEBX | LQFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.07 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.703 | 8.448 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.99 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.48 | 4.65 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.76 | 34.88 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.38 | 34.68 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers