Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LQFLX vs RMFCX
LQFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LQFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R3
Price$13.69
Change+$0.12 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.09M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
LQFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LQFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LQFLX (36.1M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LQFLX: RMFCX (1.31) vs LQFLX (0.34). LQFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LQFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LQFLX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LQFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LQFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LQFLX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LQFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.42 vs. RMFCX (9.01). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. LQFLX (-2.03).
| LQFLX | RMFCX | LQFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.91 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.905 | 5.919 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.1M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 1.31 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.42 | 9.01 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.31 | 17.82 | -47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.03 | 51.66 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers