Ad is loading...
LQFLX vs RMFCX
LQFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LQFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R3
Price$12.60
Change+$0.11 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.02M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.74
Change+$0.73 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.26B
LQFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LQFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 97.3B vs. LQFLX (33M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LQFLX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LQFLX (0.35). LQFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LQFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LQFLX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LQFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LQFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LQFLX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX (3.87) and LQFLX (3.83) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.30 vs. LQFLX (19.58).
| LQFLX | RMFCX | LQFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.91 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.364 | -1.247 | 350% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33M | 97.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.34 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.83 | 3.87 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.33 | 9.64 | -138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.58 | 54.30 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...