Ad is loading...
LQFLX vs RMFCX
LQFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LQFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R3
Price$13.61
Change-$0.22 (-1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.34M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.23
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.64B
LQFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LQFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. LQFLX (34.3M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LQFLX: RMFCX (1.69) vs LQFLX (0.00). LQFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LQFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LQFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). LQFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LQFLX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LQFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.92 vs. RMFCX (13.30). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.44 vs. LQFLX (-7.88).
| LQFLX | RMFCX | LQFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.432 | 6.082 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.3M | 107B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.69 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.92 | 13.30 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.88 | 20.39 | -39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.88 | 43.44 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.45 | - |