Ad is loading...
LQFLX vs RMFCX
LQFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LQFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R3
Price$13.18
Change+$0.12 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.17M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.77
Change+$0.08 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.3B
LQFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LQFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. LQFLX (34.2M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LQFLX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LQFLX (0.35). LQFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LQFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LQFLX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LQFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LQFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LQFLX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LQFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.19 vs. RMFCX (5.54). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 74.02 vs. LQFLX (45.24).
| LQFLX | RMFCX | LQFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.91 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 2.483 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.2M | 102B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.34 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.19 | 5.54 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.62 | 11.17 | -122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.24 | 74.02 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...