Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LQFLX vs RMFCX
LQFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LQFLX vs RMFCX
LQFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LQFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQFLX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LQFLX (157M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LQFLX: RMFCX (1.16) vs LQFLX (0.03). LQFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LQFLX (7 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LQFLX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LQFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LQFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LQFLX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LQFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.87 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. LQFLX (-8.86).
| LQFLX | RMFCX | LQFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.91 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.379 | 9.137 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 1.16 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.87 | 8.88 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.63 | 34.84 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.86 | 37.23 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement