LRCX
Price
$126.37
Change
+$4.47 (+3.67%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
152.47B
27 days until earnings call
TOELF
Price
$158.15
Change
+$2.19 (+1.40%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
71.52B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LRCX vs TOELF

Header iconLRCX vs TOELF Comparison
Open Charts LRCX vs TOELFBanner chart's image
Lam Research
Price$126.37
Change+$4.47 (+3.67%)
Volume$151.69K
Capitalization152.47B
Tokyo Electron
Price$158.15
Change+$2.19 (+1.40%)
Volume$6.21K
Capitalization71.52B
LRCX vs TOELF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LRCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TOELF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LRCX vs. TOELF commentary
Sep 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRCX is a Buy and TOELF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2025
Stock price -- (LRCX: $121.90 vs. TOELF: $158.15)
Brand notoriety: LRCX: Notable vs. TOELF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Production Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LRCX: 92% vs. TOELF: 592%
Market capitalization -- LRCX: $152.47B vs. TOELF: $71.52B
LRCX [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $152.47B. TOELF’s [@Electronic Production Equipment] market capitalization is $71.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $338.98B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $25.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LRCX’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileTOELF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LRCX’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • TOELF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LRCX is a better buy in the long-term than TOELF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LRCX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TOELF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LRCX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TOELF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LRCX and TOELF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LRCX (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +13.54% price change this week, while TOELF (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was +13.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +4.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

LRCX is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (+4.96% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRCX($152B) has a higher market cap than TOELF($71.5B). LRCX has higher P/E ratio than TOELF: LRCX (29.37) vs TOELF (19.77). LRCX YTD gains are higher at: 69.697 vs. TOELF (9.788). TOELF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 653B vs. LRCX (6.52B). TOELF has more cash in the bank: 526B vs. LRCX (6.39B). TOELF has higher revenues than LRCX: TOELF (2.13T) vs LRCX (18.4B).
LRCXTOELFLRCX / TOELF
Capitalization152B71.5B213%
EBITDA6.52B653B1%
Gain YTD69.6979.788712%
P/E Ratio29.3719.77149%
Revenue18.4B2.13T1%
Total Cash6.39B526B1%
Total Debt4.49BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LRCX vs TOELF: Fundamental Ratings
LRCX
TOELF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2528
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2467
SMR RATING
1..100
189
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3471
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TOELF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCX (31) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that TOELF’s stock grew similarly to LRCX’s over the last 12 months.

LRCX's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TOELF (67) in the null industry. This means that LRCX’s stock grew somewhat faster than TOELF’s over the last 12 months.

TOELF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCX (18) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that TOELF’s stock grew similarly to LRCX’s over the last 12 months.

LRCX's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TOELF (57) in the null industry. This means that LRCX’s stock grew somewhat faster than TOELF’s over the last 12 months.

LRCX's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TOELF (71) in the null industry. This means that LRCX’s stock grew somewhat faster than TOELF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LRCXTOELF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LRCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TOELF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JSMD84.680.09
+0.10%
Janus Henderson Small/Md Cp Gr Alpha ETF
DEUS57.810.01
+0.02%
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
JGRW26.99N/A
N/A
Jensen Quality Growth ETF
SCHP27.07-0.03
-0.11%
Schwab US TIPS ETF™
ITDB32.83-0.06
-0.19%
iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF

LRCX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRCX
1D Price
Change %
LRCX100%
+1.19%
AMAT - LRCX
92%
Closely correlated
+2.64%
KLAC - LRCX
91%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
VECO - LRCX
80%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
RMBS - LRCX
80%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
ENTG - LRCX
79%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
More

TOELF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOELF has been closely correlated with TOELY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TOELF jumps, then TOELY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TOELF
1D Price
Change %
TOELF100%
+1.40%
TOELY - TOELF
74%
Closely correlated
+2.44%
DSCSY - TOELF
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.82%
AMAT - TOELF
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.64%
LRCX - TOELF
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
LSRCY - TOELF
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
More