LRN
Price
$82.00
Change
+$0.55 (+0.68%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
3.41B
45 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MH
Price
$12.32
Change
+$0.21 (+1.73%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
2.36B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LRN vs MH

LRN vs MH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LRN vs. MH commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRN is a Hold and MH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRN($3.41B) has a higher market cap than MH($2.36B). MH has higher P/E ratio than LRN: MH (25.28) vs LRN (11.48). LRN YTD gains are higher at: 26.290 vs. MH (-25.333). MH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 691M vs. LRN (580M). LRN has more cash in the bank: 958M vs. MH (194M). LRN has less debt than MH: LRN (546M) vs MH (2.64B). LRN has higher revenues than MH: LRN (2.52B) vs MH (2.12B).
LRNMHLRN / MH
Capitalization3.41B2.36B145%
EBITDA580M691M84%
Gain YTD26.290-25.333-104%
P/E Ratio11.4825.2845%
Revenue2.52B2.12B119%
Total Cash958M194M494%
Total Debt546M2.64B21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LRN: Fundamental Ratings
LRN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
75
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72
SMR RATING
1..100
45
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LRNMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 13, 2026
Stock price -- (LRN: $82.00 vs. MH: $12.32)
Brand notoriety: LRN and MH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LRN: 59% vs. MH: 80%
Market capitalization -- LRN: $3.41B vs. MH: $2.36B
LRN [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $3.41B. MH’s [@Other Consumer Specialties] market capitalization is $2.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $90 to $8.76B. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LRN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while MH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LRN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LRN is a better buy in the long-term than MH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LRN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LRN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MH is a better buy in the short-term than LRN.

Price Growth

LRN (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -3.16% price change this week, while MH (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was -7.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -3.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

LRN is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

MH is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (-3.93% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

View a ticker or compare two or three
LRN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KSTR22.560.29
+1.30%
KraneShares CHN Tech & Semicon STAR50ETF
TMFC79.180.72
+0.92%
Motley Fool 100 ETF
QUSA17.780.11
+0.62%
Vistashares Target 15 Usa Quality Income ETF
QTJA33.900.21
+0.61%
Innovator Growth Accelerated Pls ETF Jan
BLUI25.40-0.02
-0.06%
Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF

LRN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRN has been loosely correlated with LOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LRN jumps, then LOPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRN
1D Price
Change %
LRN100%
+0.68%
LOPE - LRN
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.01%
PRDO - LRN
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
MH - LRN
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
MMS - LRN
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
BAER - LRN
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MH has been loosely correlated with STRA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MH jumps, then STRA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MH
1D Price
Change %
MH100%
+1.73%
STRA - MH
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
COUR - MH
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
LOPE - MH
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
LRN - MH
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
PRDO - MH
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
More