Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSAGX vs NPFCX
LSAGX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSAGX vs NPFCX
LSAGX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSAGX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSAGX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. LSAGX (113M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than LSAGX: NPFCX (0.33) vs LSAGX (0.00). LSAGX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: LSAGX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than LSAGX (1.33). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSAGX (12.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSAGX: NPFCX (250) vs LSAGX (2500). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.16 vs. LSAGX (-9.57). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.21 vs. LSAGX (4.42).
| LSAGX | NPFCX | LSAGX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.47 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.47 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.527 | 2.656 | -434% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.57 | 2.16 | -442% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.12 | 27.59 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.42 | 5.21 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.89 | 90.85 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers