Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSAGX vs NPFCX
LSAGX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSAGX vs NPFCX
LSAGX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSAGX vs. NPFCX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSAGX is a Hold and NPFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. LSAGX (120M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than LSAGX: NPFCX (0.33) vs LSAGX (0.00). LSAGX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: LSAGX (10 years) vs NPFCX (26 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than LSAGX (1.33). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSAGX (12.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSAGX: NPFCX (250) vs LSAGX (2500). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.58 vs. LSAGX (-7.73). LSAGX return over 5 years is better than : 10.76 vs. NPFCX (6.70).
| LSAGX | NPFCX | LSAGX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.47 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.47 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.159 | 6.686 | -92% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 120M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.73 | 4.58 | -169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.43 | 36.89 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.76 | 6.70 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.11 | 98.40 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers