Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSAGX vs NPFFX
LSAGX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts LSAGX vs NPFFX
LSAGX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSAGX vs. NPFFX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSAGX is a Hold and NPFFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. LSAGX (120M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than LSAGX: NPFFX (0.92) vs LSAGX (0.00). LSAGX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: LSAGX (10 years) vs NPFFX (26 years). LSAGX (1.33) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.77). NPFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSAGX (12.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSAGX: NPFFX (250) vs LSAGX (2500). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.70 vs. LSAGX (-7.73). NPFFX (11.26) and LSAGX (10.76) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LSAGX | NPFFX | LSAGX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.77 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.77 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.159 | 7.201 | -86% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 120M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.92 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.73 | 5.70 | -136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.43 | 41.04 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.76 | 11.26 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.11 | 110.45 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement