Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSAGX vs NPFFX
LSAGX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts LSAGX vs NPFFX
LSAGX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSAGX vs. NPFFX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSAGX is a Buy and NPFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. LSAGX (123M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than LSAGX: NPFFX (0.94) vs LSAGX (0.00). LSAGX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: LSAGX (10 years) vs NPFFX (25 years). LSAGX (1.33) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.77). NPFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSAGX (12.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSAGX: NPFFX (250) vs LSAGX (2500). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. LSAGX (-3.37). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.60 vs. LSAGX (11.95).
| LSAGX | NPFFX | LSAGX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.77 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.77 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.453 | 9.030 | -49% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 123M | 166B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.94 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.37 | 8.52 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.22 | 43.60 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.95 | 14.60 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.46 | 111.21 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers