Advertisement
LSCC vs TER
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) vs. Teradyne (TER) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Teradyne (TER) has significantly outperformed Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) year-to-date (YTD), with returns around 107% compared to LSCC's 55%.
- TER boasts a larger market capitalization of approximately $59.5 billion versus LSCC's $15.6 billion, reflecting greater scale in the semiconductor ecosystem.
- Both companies reported strong recent quarterly results, with TER exceeding Q1 2026 earnings expectations despite a post-earnings pullback.
- LSCC has shown resilience in recent weeks, buoyed by collaborations in edge AI and upcoming earnings anticipation.
- TER's one-year returns exceed 423%, dwarfing LSCC's 133%, driven by robust demand in semiconductor testing and robotics.
- Analysts maintain positive outlooks for both, with average price targets suggesting modest upside potential amid AI-driven sector tailwinds.
Introduction
Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) and Teradyne (TER) are key players in the semiconductor industry, focusing on programmable logic and testing equipment, respectively. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors tracking edge computing, AI acceleration, and industrial automation trends. Traders seeking exposure to high-growth niches within semiconductors may find value in evaluating their relative performance, valuation metrics, and market positioning. With both stocks benefiting from broader sector momentum, understanding their contrasts helps inform portfolio decisions in a volatile market environment.
LSCC Overview and Recent Performance
Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) specializes in low-power field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and related solutions for edge computing, automotive, and industrial applications. In recent market activity, LSCC shares have traded within a 52-week range of $43.90 to $126.35, reflecting strong recovery from prior lows. The stock has gained about 55% YTD and 133% over the past year, supported by solid Q4 2025 results where revenue reached $145.8 million, beating estimates. Sentiment has been bolstered by partnerships, such as with Texas Instruments for edge AI in robotics, and anticipation ahead of Q1 2026 earnings on May 4. Recent weeks have seen upward momentum amid analyst upgrades, though high price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio above 5,000 signals premium valuation tied to growth expectations.
TER Overview and Recent Performance
Teradyne (TER) provides automated test equipment for semiconductors and robotics solutions, capitalizing on AI chip demand and system-level testing needs. Shares have surged within a 52-week range of $71.27 to $422.11, with YTD gains near 107% and one-year returns over 423%. Recent Q1 2026 results showcased revenue of $1.28 billion and adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of $2.56, surpassing forecasts, though shares dipped around 8.5% post-announcement due to sequential guidance concerns and market pressures. Positive developments include an acquisition of TestInsight to speed robotics testing and strong semiconductor test segment growth at $561 million in prior quarters. Analyst sentiment remains bullish, with raised price targets.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from its library of over 350 AI trading bots that analyze and trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and cryptocurrencies. Only the most suitable bots for prevailing market conditions—based on factors like volatility, trends, and asset classes—earn a spot in this dynamic section, which currently features 25 standout agents. These include AI Trading Signal Agents for real-time alerts, Virtual Agents for simulated strategies, and Brokerage Agents for automated execution, spanning timeframes from 5-minute to 60-minute charts and approaches like technical analysis, fundamental screening, and risk-adjusted models. With diverse performance histories tailored to different styles, they offer tools for short-term traders to long-term investors. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots aligning with your market outlook.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) and Teradyne (TER) both thrive in AI-enabling semiconductors but diverge in focus: LSCC on customizable FPGAs for power-efficient edge devices versus TER's dominance in high-volume chip testing and robotics platforms. Growth drivers include surging demand for AI inference at the edge for LSCC and fab expansion/testing needs for TER. Recent momentum favors TER's explosive multi-year gains, though LSCC offers niche stability in industrial/automotive verticals. Risk factors encompass supply chain vulnerabilities and cyclical semis downturns, with TER's larger scale providing diversification via robotics. Sector exposure overlaps in AI/semiconductors, but TER benefits from broader testing applicability. Market sentiment tilts toward TER's proven catalysts, while LSCC trades at elevated multiples reflecting specialized positioning.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward Teradyne (TER) due to superior trend consistency, outsized YTD and multi-year returns, and resilient earnings beats amid sector volatility. LSCC remains compelling for targeted edge AI plays, but TER's scale, momentum, and diversified catalysts position it more favorably in the near term, with higher probabilistic upside based on relative performance metrics.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCC is a Hold and TER is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LSCC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTER’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- LSCC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TER’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LSCC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TER’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LSCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TER’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LSCC (@Semiconductors) experienced а +7.60% price change this week, while TER (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was +14.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +107.27%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +9.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +154.84%.
Reported Earning Dates
LSCC is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
TER is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Semiconductors (+5.94% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
@Electronic Production Equipment (+9.74% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
| LSCC | TER | LSCC / TER | |
| Capitalization | 21.1B | 68.6B | 31% |
| EBITDA | 77.5M | 1.14B | 7% |
| Gain YTD | 108.915 | 126.425 | 86% |
| P/E Ratio | 1098.00 | 81.25 | 1,351% |
| Revenue | 574M | 3.79B | 15% |
| Total Cash | 140M | 246M | 57% |
| Total Debt | 39.9M | 82.4M | 48% |
LSCC | TER | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 91 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 2 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 33 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TER's Valuation (80) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as LSCC (99) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that TER’s stock grew similarly to LSCC’s over the last 12 months.
TER's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as LSCC (27) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that TER’s stock grew similarly to LSCC’s over the last 12 months.
TER's SMR Rating (34) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSCC (90) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that TER’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSCC’s over the last 12 months.
TER's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSCC (35) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that TER’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSCC’s over the last 12 months.
LSCC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TER (5) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that LSCC’s stock grew similarly to TER’s over the last 12 months.
| LSCC | TER | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
LSCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSCC has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LSCC jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSCC | 100% | +9.91% | ||
| KLIC - LSCC | 76% Closely correlated | +4.78% | ||
| ENTG - LSCC | 73% Closely correlated | +13.62% | ||
| KLAC - LSCC | 73% Closely correlated | +8.73% | ||
| LRCX - LSCC | 70% Closely correlated | +3.97% | ||
| VECO - LSCC | 68% Closely correlated | +5.11% | ||
More | ||||