Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSCGX vs NPFCX
LSCGX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSCGX vs NPFCX
LSCGX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCGX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCGX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. LSCGX (127M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: NPFCX (0.33) vs LSCGX (0.00). LSCGX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: LSCGX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). LSCGX (2.08) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.47). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSCGX (12.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: NPFCX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.68 vs. LSCGX (6.70). LSCGX return over 5 years is better than : 16.10 vs. NPFCX (14.35).
| LSCGX | NPFCX | LSCGX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.47 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 1.47 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.257 | 6.915 | -18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 127M | 164B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.70 | 12.68 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.18 | 39.88 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.10 | 14.35 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.14 | 102.83 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement