Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSCGX vs NPFCX
LSCGX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSCGX vs NPFCX
LSCGX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCGX vs. NPFCX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCGX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. LSCGX (119M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: NPFCX (0.33) vs LSCGX (0.00). LSCGX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: LSCGX (10 years) vs NPFCX (26 years). LSCGX (2.08) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.47). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSCGX (12.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: NPFCX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.59 vs. LSCGX (-11.41). LSCGX return over 5 years is better than : 7.27 vs. NPFCX (6.34).
| LSCGX | NPFCX | LSCGX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.47 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 1.47 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.601 | 5.633 | -117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 119M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.41 | 1.59 | -718% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.07 | 36.28 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.27 | 6.34 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.29 | 95.50 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers