Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSCGX vs NPFFX
LSCGX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts LSCGX vs NPFFX
LSCGX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCGX vs. NPFFX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCGX is a Hold and NPFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. LSCGX (119M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: NPFFX (0.92) vs LSCGX (0.00). LSCGX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: LSCGX (10 years) vs NPFFX (26 years). LSCGX (2.08) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.77). NPFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSCGX (12.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: NPFFX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.67 vs. LSCGX (-11.41). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 10.86 vs. LSCGX (7.27).
| LSCGX | NPFFX | LSCGX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.77 | 253% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 0.77 | 270% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.601 | 6.144 | -107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 119M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.92 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.41 | 2.67 | -428% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.07 | 40.37 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.27 | 10.86 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.29 | 107.29 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers