Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSCGX vs NPFFX
LSCGX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts LSCGX vs NPFFX
LSCGX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCGX vs. NPFFX commentary
Aug 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCGX is a Buy and NPFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. LSCGX (120M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: NPFFX (0.94) vs LSCGX (0.00). LSCGX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: LSCGX (10 years) vs NPFFX (25 years). LSCGX (2.08) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.77). NPFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSCGX (12.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: NPFFX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.43 vs. LSCGX (-3.69). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.68 vs. LSCGX (5.51).
| LSCGX | NPFFX | LSCGX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.77 | 253% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 0.77 | 270% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.286 | 7.258 | -87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 120M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.94 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.69 | 8.43 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.79 | 39.60 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.51 | 12.68 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.82 | 109.13 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement