Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSCRX vs NAESX
LSCRX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LSCRX vs NAESX
LSCRX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCRX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCRX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. LSCRX (353M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LSCRX: NAESX (1.07) vs LSCRX (0.75). LSCRX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LSCRX (30 years) vs NAESX (66 years). LSCRX (1.21) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LSCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCRX: NAESX (0) vs LSCRX (2500). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.10 vs. LSCRX (5.91). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 34.72 vs. LSCRX (-26.03).
| LSCRX | NAESX | LSCRX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.17 | 676% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.17 | 712% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.833 | 15.738 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353M | 189B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.91 | 22.10 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.27 | 48.79 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.03 | 34.72 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.70 | 157.23 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement