Advertisement
LSE vs USAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSE is a Hold and USAC is a Buy.
| LSE | USAC | LSE / USAC | |
| Capitalization | 92.5M | 4.01B | 2% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 669M | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.629 | 27.664 | 93% |
| P/E Ratio | 67.94 | 25.83 | 263% |
| Revenue | N/A | 1.18B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 9.48M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 2.96B | - |
USAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LSE | USAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 67% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LSE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while USAC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- LSE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- USAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LSE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USAC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LSE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- USAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
LSE (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +3.58% price change this week, while USAC (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +1.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.35%.
Reported Earning Dates
USAC is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+0.17% weekly)The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SKYU | 48.75 | 1.12 | +2.35% |
| ProShares Ultra Cloud Computing | |||
| ESGE | 54.86 | 0.65 | +1.20% |
| iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF | |||
| FLQS | 48.42 | 0.23 | +0.49% |
| Franklin US Small Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF | |||
| FSMB | 19.75 | 0.02 | +0.13% |
| First Trust Short Dur Mgd Muncpl ETF | |||
| SDOW | 23.93 | -0.68 | -2.76% |
| ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 | |||
LSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSE and ACDC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSE and ACDC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSE | 100% | +2.23% | ||
| ACDC - LSE | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
| USAC - LSE | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.47% | ||
| KLXE - LSE | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LBRT - LSE | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.96% | ||
| BKR - LSE | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.57% | ||
More | ||||
USAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USAC has been loosely correlated with TTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USAC jumps, then TTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USAC | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| TTI - USAC | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| AROC - USAC | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| DNOW - USAC | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| FET - USAC | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.54% | ||
| NOV - USAC | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
More | ||||