Ad is loading...
LSFLX vs RMEBX
LSFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$12.30
Change-$0.14 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.63M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$52.90
Change-$0.68 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.76B
LSFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 97.8B vs. LSFLX (32.6M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMEBX (1.18) vs LSFLX (0.67). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LSFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LSFLX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LSFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.58 vs. RMEBX (3.30). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.73 vs. LSFLX (18.61).
| LSFLX | RMEBX | LSFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.07 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.07 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.183 | -3.381 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.6M | 97.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.18 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.58 | 3.30 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.32 | 5.10 | -320% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.61 | 47.73 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...