Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSFLX vs RMEBX
LSFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$15.27
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.96M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.57
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
LSFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LSFLX (75M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMEBX (1.05) vs LSFLX (0.58). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LSFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LSFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LSFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.46 vs. RMEBX (7.71). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 57.72 vs. LSFLX (12.91).
| LSFLX | RMEBX | LSFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.07 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.07 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.311 | 14.848 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.05 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.46 | 7.71 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.49 | 43.29 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.91 | 57.72 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement