Ad is loading...
LSFLX vs RMEBX
LSFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$13.14
Change+$0.03 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.73M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.29
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
LSFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. LSFLX (33.7M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMEBX (1.21) vs LSFLX (0.68). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LSFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LSFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LSFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.16 vs. RMEBX (4.24). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 54.68 vs. LSFLX (15.50).
| LSFLX | RMEBX | LSFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.07 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.07 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.152 | 0.984 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.7M | 101B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.21 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.16 | 4.24 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.53 | 16.76 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.50 | 54.68 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...