Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSFLX vs RMEBX
LSFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMEBX
LSFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LSFLX (160M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMEBX (1.04) vs LSFLX (0.23). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LSFLX (7 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). LSFLX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LSFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.40 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. LSFLX (-10.70).
| LSFLX | RMEBX | LSFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.07 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.07 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.677 | 6.308 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 1.04 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.40 | 9.11 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.45 | 34.37 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.70 | 34.74 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement