Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSFLX vs RMEBX
LSFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMEBX
LSFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LSFLX (161M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMEBX (1.00) vs LSFLX (0.22). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LSFLX (7 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). LSFLX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LSFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.64 vs. RMEBX (8.09). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.06 vs. LSFLX (-7.89).
| LSFLX | RMEBX | LSFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.07 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.07 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.645 | 9.365 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 1.00 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.64 | 8.09 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.49 | 32.10 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.89 | 36.06 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers