Ad is loading...
LSFLX vs RMFCX
LSFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$13.14
Change+$0.03 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.73M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.99
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
LSFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. LSFLX (33.7M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMFCX (1.37) vs LSFLX (0.68). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LSFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LSFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LSFLX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.16 vs. RMFCX (4.39). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.82 vs. LSFLX (15.50).
| LSFLX | RMFCX | LSFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.91 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.152 | 1.050 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.7M | 101B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.37 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.16 | 4.39 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.53 | 17.27 | -26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.50 | 55.82 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.49 | - |