Ad is loading...
LSFLX vs RMFCX
LSFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$12.30
Change-$0.14 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.63M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.60
Change-$0.69 (-1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.76B
LSFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 97.8B vs. LSFLX (32.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LSFLX (0.67). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LSFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LSFLX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LSFLX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.58 vs. RMFCX (3.42). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.78 vs. LSFLX (18.61).
| LSFLX | RMFCX | LSFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.91 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.183 | -3.342 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.6M | 97.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.34 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.58 | 3.42 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.32 | 5.55 | -294% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.61 | 48.78 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...