Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSFLX vs RMFCX
LSFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$14.30
Change+$0.10 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.65M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
LSFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LSFLX (39.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMFCX (1.27) vs LSFLX (0.62). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LSFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LSFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LSFLX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.15 vs. RMFCX (11.47). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. LSFLX (14.04).
| LSFLX | RMFCX | LSFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.91 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.994 | 9.596 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.27 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.15 | 11.47 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.53 | 29.27 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.04 | 61.83 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement