Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSFLX vs RMFCX
LSFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$15.27
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.96M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.21
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
LSFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LSFLX (75M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMFCX (1.20) vs LSFLX (0.58). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LSFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LSFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LSFLX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.46 vs. RMFCX (7.84). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.89 vs. LSFLX (12.91).
| LSFLX | RMFCX | LSFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.91 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.311 | 14.983 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.20 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.46 | 7.84 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.49 | 43.87 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.91 | 58.89 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement