Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSFLX vs RMFCX
LSFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$13.71
Change-$0.12 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
LSFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LSFLX (37.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMFCX (1.31) vs LSFLX (0.64). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LSFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LSFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LSFLX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.62 vs. RMFCX (8.70). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. LSFLX (8.66).
| LSFLX | RMFCX | LSFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.91 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.497 | 6.021 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.31 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.62 | 8.70 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.68 | 28.43 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.66 | 59.85 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement