Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSFLX vs RMFCX
LSFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMFCX
LSFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LSFLX (160M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMFCX (1.19) vs LSFLX (0.23). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LSFLX (7 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LSFLX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LSFLX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.40 vs. RMFCX (9.24). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.66 vs. LSFLX (-10.70).
| LSFLX | RMFCX | LSFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.91 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.677 | 6.368 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 1.19 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.40 | 9.24 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.45 | 34.91 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.70 | 35.66 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers