Ad is loading...
LSFLX vs RMFEX
LSFLX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$12.30
Change-$0.14 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.63M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$52.93
Change-$0.68 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.76B
LSFLX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 97.8B vs. LSFLX (32.6M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMFEX (1.61) vs LSFLX (0.67). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LSFLX (6 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LSFLX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LSFLX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.58 vs. RMFEX (3.75). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 51.09 vs. LSFLX (18.61).
| LSFLX | RMFEX | LSFLX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.62 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.62 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.183 | -3.251 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.6M | 97.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.61 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.58 | 3.75 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.32 | 6.54 | -250% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.61 | 51.09 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...