Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSFLX vs RMFEX
LSFLX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$14.30
Change+$0.10 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.65M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.82
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
LSFLX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LSFLX (39.6M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMFEX (1.53) vs LSFLX (0.62). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LSFLX (6 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LSFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LSFLX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.15 vs. RMFEX (11.81). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 64.33 vs. LSFLX (14.04).
| LSFLX | RMFEX | LSFLX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.62 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.62 | 265% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.994 | 9.748 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.53 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.15 | 11.81 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.53 | 30.45 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.04 | 64.33 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 86.20 | - |