Ad is loading...
LSFLX vs RMFEX
LSFLX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$13.14
Change+$0.03 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.73M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$55.34
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
LSFLX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMFEX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. LSFLX (33.7M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMFEX (1.65) vs LSFLX (0.68). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LSFLX (6 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LSFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LSFLX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.16 vs. RMFEX (4.72). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.22 vs. LSFLX (15.50).
| LSFLX | RMFEX | LSFLX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.62 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.62 | 265% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.152 | 1.154 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.7M | 101B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.16 | 4.72 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.53 | 18.36 | -25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.50 | 58.22 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...