Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSFLX vs RMFEX
LSFLX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMFEX
LSFLX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LSFLX (161M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMFEX (1.42) vs LSFLX (0.22). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LSFLX (7 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). LSFLX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LSFLX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.64 vs. RMFEX (8.58). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.19 vs. LSFLX (-7.89).
| LSFLX | RMFEX | LSFLX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.62 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.62 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.645 | 9.643 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 1.42 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.64 | 8.58 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.49 | 33.91 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.89 | 39.19 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 99.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement