Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSGGX vs NPFCX
LSGGX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSGGX vs NPFCX
LSGGX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSGGX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSGGX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. LSGGX (121M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than LSGGX: NPFCX (0.33) vs LSGGX (0.00). LSGGX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: LSGGX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than LSGGX (1.08). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSGGX (12.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGGX: NPFCX (250) vs LSGGX (100000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.04 vs. LSGGX (-1.32). LSGGX return over 5 years is better than : 13.35 vs. NPFCX (10.00).
| LSGGX | NPFCX | LSGGX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.47 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.47 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.177 | 6.335 | -82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 121M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.32 | 7.04 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.57 | 35.38 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.35 | 10.00 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.62 | 99.72 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers