Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSGGX vs NPFCX
LSGGX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSGGX vs NPFCX
LSGGX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSGGX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSGGX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. LSGGX (121M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than LSGGX: NPFCX (0.33) vs LSGGX (0.00). LSGGX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: LSGGX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than LSGGX (1.08). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSGGX (12.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGGX: NPFCX (250) vs LSGGX (100000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.61 vs. LSGGX (1.63). LSGGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.99 vs. NPFCX (12.94).
| LSGGX | NPFCX | LSGGX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.47 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.47 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.952 | 6.243 | -95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 121M | 172B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.63 | 11.61 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.47 | 34.24 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.99 | 12.94 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.41 | 104.50 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers