Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSGRX vs RGABX
LSGRX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts LSGRX vs RGABX
LSGRX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSGRX vs. RGABX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSGRX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. LSGRX (16.4B). LSGRX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . LSGRX was incepted earlier than RGABX: LSGRX (35 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than LSGRX (0.66). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LSGRX (7.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: RGABX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.83 vs. LSGRX (3.14). LSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 19.96 vs. RGABX (10.82).
| LSGRX | RGABX | LSGRX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.38 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.38 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.111 | 8.319 | -73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.4B | 361B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.14 | 9.83 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.05 | 41.24 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.96 | 10.82 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 175.50 | 97.06 | 181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement