Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSGRX vs RGABX
LSGRX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts LSGRX vs RGABX
LSGRX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSGRX vs. RGABX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSGRX is a Hold and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. LSGRX (16.8B). LSGRX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . LSGRX was incepted earlier than RGABX: LSGRX (35 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than LSGRX (0.66). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LSGRX (7.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: RGABX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.20 vs. LSGRX (0.66). LSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 19.63 vs. RGABX (7.85).
| LSGRX | RGABX | LSGRX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.38 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.38 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.672 | 6.715 | -55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.8B | 357B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.66 | 2.20 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.87 | 32.48 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.63 | 7.85 | 250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.58 | 83.21 | 200% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement